Merge branch 'master' into python-2.4

This commit is contained in:
rocky
2020-01-26 12:00:11 -05:00
54 changed files with 794 additions and 639 deletions

View File

@@ -31,9 +31,12 @@ from uncompyle6.scanners.tok import Token
from uncompyle6.parser import PythonParser, PythonParserSingle, nop_func
from uncompyle6.parsers.reducecheck import (
except_handler_else,
ifstmt,
# iflaststmt,
testtrue,
tryelsestmtl3
tryelsestmtl3,
tryexcept,
while1stmt
)
from uncompyle6.parsers.treenode import SyntaxTree
from spark_parser import DEFAULT_DEBUG as PARSER_DEFAULT_DEBUG
@@ -153,10 +156,12 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
testfalse ::= expr jmp_false
testtrue ::= expr jmp_true
_ifstmts_jump ::= return_if_stmts
_ifstmts_jump ::= c_stmts_opt come_froms
_ifstmts_jump ::= return_if_stmts
_ifstmts_jump ::= stmts _come_froms
_ifstmts_jumpl ::= c_stmts_opt come_froms
iflaststmt ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt JUMP_ABSOLUTE
iflaststmt ::= testexpr stmts_opt JUMP_ABSOLUTE
iflaststmt ::= testexpr _ifstmts_jumpl
# ifstmts where we are in a loop
_ifstmts_jumpl ::= _ifstmts_jump
@@ -171,16 +176,22 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
# of missing "else" clauses. Therefore we include grammar
# rules with and without ELSE.
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt JUMP_FORWARD
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr stmts_opt JUMP_FORWARD
else_suite opt_come_from_except
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt jump_forward_else
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr stmts_opt jump_forward_else
else_suite _come_froms
# ifelsestmt ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt jump_forward_else
# pass _come_froms
# FIXME: remove this
stmt ::= ifelsestmtc
c_stmts ::= ifelsestmtc
ifelsestmtc ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt JUMP_ABSOLUTE else_suitec
ifelsestmtc ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt jump_absolute_else else_suitec
ifelsestmtc ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt jump_forward_else else_suitec _come_froms
# "if"/"else" statement that ends in a RETURN
ifelsestmtr ::= testexpr return_if_stmts returns
@@ -216,8 +227,7 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
except_handler ::= JUMP_FORWARD COME_FROM except_stmts
END_FINALLY COME_FROM_EXCEPT
except_stmts ::= except_stmts except_stmt
except_stmts ::= except_stmt
except_stmts ::= except_stmt+
except_stmt ::= except_cond1 except_suite
except_stmt ::= except_cond2 except_suite
@@ -356,6 +366,28 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
stmt ::= whileTruestmt
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr c_stmts_opt JUMP_FORWARD else_suite _come_froms
# FIXME: go over this
_stmts ::= _stmts last_stmt
stmts ::= last_stmt
stmts_opt ::= stmts
last_stmt ::= iflaststmt
last_stmt ::= forelselaststmt
iflaststmt ::= testexpr last_stmt JUMP_ABSOLUTE
iflaststmt ::= testexpr stmts JUMP_ABSOLUTE
_iflaststmts_jump ::= stmts last_stmt
_ifstmts_jump ::= stmts_opt JUMP_FORWARD _come_froms
iflaststmt ::= testexpr _iflaststmts_jump
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr stmts_opt jump_absolute_else else_suite
ifelsestmt ::= testexpr stmts_opt jump_forward_else else_suite _come_froms
else_suite ::= stmts
else_suitel ::= stmts
# FIXME: remove this
_ifstmts_jump ::= c_stmts_opt JUMP_FORWARD _come_froms
# statements with continue and break
c_stmts ::= _stmts
c_stmts ::= _stmts lastc_stmt
@@ -1510,8 +1542,9 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
self.check_reduce["testtrue"] = "tokens"
if not PYTHON3:
self.check_reduce["kwarg"] = "noAST"
if self.version < 3.6:
if self.version < 3.6 and not self.is_pypy:
# 3.6+ can remove a JUMP_FORWARD which messes up our testing here
# Pypy we need to go over in better detail
self.check_reduce["try_except"] = "AST"
self.check_reduce["tryelsestmtl3"] = "AST"
@@ -1522,6 +1555,7 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
def reduce_is_invalid(self, rule, ast, tokens, first, last):
lhs = rule[0]
n = len(tokens)
last = min(last, n-1)
if lhs in ("aug_assign1", "aug_assign2") and ast[0][0] == "and":
return True
elif lhs == "annotate_tuple":
@@ -1534,13 +1568,20 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
# elif lhs == "iflaststmtl":
# return iflaststmt(self, lhs, n, rule, ast, tokens, first, last)
elif rule == ("ifstmt", ("testexpr", "_ifstmts_jump")):
# FIXME: go over what's up with 3.0. Evetually I'd like to remove RETURN_END_IF
if self.version <= 3.0 or tokens[last] == "RETURN_END_IF":
return False
if ifstmt(self, lhs, n, rule, ast, tokens, first, last):
return True
# FIXME: do we need the below or is it covered by "ifstmt" above?
condition_jump = ast[0].last_child()
if condition_jump.kind.startswith("POP_JUMP_IF"):
condition_jump2 = tokens[min(last - 1, len(tokens) - 1)]
if condition_jump2.kind.startswith("POP_JUMP_IF"):
# If there are two *distinct* condition jumps, they should not jump to the
# same place. Otherwise we have some sort of "and"/"or".
if condition_jump2.kind.startswith("POP_JUMP_IF") and condition_jump != condition_jump2:
return condition_jump.attr == condition_jump2.attr
last = min(last, n-1)
if tokens[last] == "COME_FROM" and tokens[last].off2int() != condition_jump.attr:
return False
@@ -1571,35 +1612,9 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
return tryelsestmtl3(self, lhs, n, rule, ast, tokens, first, last)
elif lhs == "while1stmt":
# If there is a fall through to the COME_FROM_LOOP, then this is
# not a while 1. So the instruction before should either be a
# JUMP_BACK or the instruction before should not be the target of a
# jump. (Well that last clause i not quite right; that target could be
# from dead code. Ugh. We need a more uniform control flow analysis.)
if last == len(tokens) or tokens[last - 1] == "COME_FROM_LOOP":
cfl = last - 1
else:
cfl = last
assert tokens[cfl] == "COME_FROM_LOOP"
if while1stmt(self, lhs, n, rule, ast, tokens, first, last):
return True
for i in range(cfl - 1, first, -1):
if tokens[i] != "POP_BLOCK":
break
if tokens[i].kind not in ("JUMP_BACK", "RETURN_VALUE", "BREAK_LOOP"):
if not tokens[i].kind.startswith("COME_FROM"):
return True
# Check that the SETUP_LOOP jumps to the offset after the
# COME_FROM_LOOP
# Python 3.0 has additional:
# JUMP_FORWARD here
# COME_FROM
# POP_TOP
# COME_FROM
# here:
# (target of SETUP_LOOP)
# We won't check this.
if self.version == 3.0:
return False
@@ -1643,24 +1658,8 @@ class Python3Parser(PythonParser):
return False
# 3.8+ Doesn't have SETUP_LOOP
return self.version < 3.8 and tokens[first].attr > tokens[last].offset
elif rule == (
"try_except",
(
"SETUP_EXCEPT",
"suite_stmts_opt",
"POP_BLOCK",
"except_handler",
"opt_come_from_except",
),
):
come_from_except = ast[-1]
if come_from_except[0] == "COME_FROM":
# There should be at last two COME_FROMs, one from an
# exception handler and one from the try. Otherwise
# we have a try/else.
return True
pass
elif lhs == "try_except":
return tryexcept(self, lhs, n, rule, ast, tokens, first, last)
elif rule == (
"ifelsestmt",
(