jinx/python-uncompyle6
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/rocky/python-uncompyle6.git synced 2025-08-02 16:44:46 +08:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix spelling via "codespell"

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
rocky
2023-12-17 10:52:32 -05:00
parent e9120eab45
commit dcc9d1a571
30 changed files with 81 additions and 81 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

16
uncompyle6/scanners/scanner2.py
View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
# Copyright (c) 2015-2022 by Rocky Bernstein
# Copyright (c) 2015-2023 by Rocky Bernstein
# Copyright (c) 2005 by Dan Pascu <dan@windowmaker.org>
# Copyright (c) 2000-2002 by hartmut Goebel <h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com>
#
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ class Scanner2(Scanner):
self.load_asserts = set([])
# Create opcode classification sets
# Note: super initilization above initializes self.opc
# Note: super initialization above initializes self.opc
# Ops that start SETUP_ ... We will COME_FROM with these names
# Some blocks and END_ statements. And they can start
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ class Scanner2(Scanner):
# EXTENDED_ARG doesn't appear in instructions,
# but is instead the next opcode folded into it, and has the offset
# of the EXTENDED_ARG. Therefor in self.offset2nist_index we'll find
# of the EXTENDED_ARG. Therefore in self.offset2nist_index we'll find
# the instruction at the previous EXTENDED_ARG offset which is 3
# bytes back.
if j is None and offset > self.opc.ARG_MAX_VALUE:
@@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ class Scanner2(Scanner):
# Is it an "and" inside an "if" or "while" block
if op == self.opc.PJIF:
# Search for other POP_JUMP_IF_...'s targetting the
# Search for other POP_JUMP_IF_...'s targeting the
# same target, of the current POP_JUMP_... instruction,
# starting from current offset, and filter everything inside inner 'or'
# jumps and mid-line ifs
@@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ class Scanner2(Scanner):
):
self.fixed_jumps[offset] = rtarget
else:
# note test for < 2.7 might be superflous although informative
# note test for < 2.7 might be superfluous although informative
# for 2.7 a different branch is taken and the below code is handled
# under: elif op in self.pop_jump_if_or_pop
# below
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@ class Scanner2(Scanner):
if code_pre_rtarget in self.jump_forward:
if_end = self.get_target(pre_rtarget)
# Is this a loop and not an "if" statment?
# Is this a loop and not an "if" statement?
if (if_end < pre_rtarget) and (pre[if_end] in self.setup_loop_targets):
if if_end > start:
@@ -1337,9 +1337,9 @@ class Scanner2(Scanner):
# FIXME FIXME FIXME
# All the conditions are horrible, and I am not sure I
# undestand fully what's going l
# understand fully what's going l
# We REALLY REALLY need a better way to handle control flow
# Expecially for < 2.7
# Especially for < 2.7
if label is not None and label != -1:
if self.version[:2] == (2, 7):
# FIXME: rocky: I think we need something like this...