diff --git a/test/bytecode_2.7_run/07_for_if_else-continue.pyc b/test/bytecode_2.7_run/07_for_if_else-continue.pyc
index e4894c38..616fa031 100644
Binary files a/test/bytecode_2.7_run/07_for_if_else-continue.pyc and b/test/bytecode_2.7_run/07_for_if_else-continue.pyc differ
diff --git a/test/simple_source/bug27+/07_for_if_else-continue.py b/test/simple_source/bug27+/07_for_if_else-continue.py
index 3944232a..d1e421fe 100644
--- a/test/simple_source/bug27+/07_for_if_else-continue.py
+++ b/test/simple_source/bug27+/07_for_if_else-continue.py
@@ -1,15 +1,17 @@
 # Issue #413 on 2.7
 # Bug in handling CONTINUE in else block of if-then-else in a for loop
+# Bug was "if" and "else" jump back to loop getting detected.
+# RUNNABLE!
 
 """This program is self-checking!"""
-def test1(a, r = None):
+def test1(a, r = []):
     for b in a:
         if b:
-            r = b
+            r.append(3)
         else:
+            r.append(5)
             continue
-            raise AssertionError("CONTINUE not followed")
-        if b:
+        if r == []:
             pass
     return r
 
@@ -27,7 +29,13 @@ def test2(a, r = None):
         raise AssertionError("CONTINUE not followed")
     return r
 
-assert test1([True]) == True, "Incorrect flow"
+assert test1([], []) == [], "For loop not taken"
+assert test1([False], []) == [5], "if 'else' should have been taken"
+assert test1([True], []) == [3], "if 'then' should have been taken"
+assert test1([True, True], []) == [3, 3], "if should have been taken"
+assert test1([True, False], []) == [3, 5], "if and then 'else' should have been taken"
+assert test1([False, True], []) == [5, 3], "if else and then 'then' should have been taken"
+assert test1([False, False], []) == [5, 5], "if else should have been taken twice"
+assert test1([True, True], []) == [3, 3], "if 'then' should have been taken twice"
 assert test2([True]) is None, "Incorrect flow"
-assert test1([False]) is None, "Incorrect flow"
 assert test2([False]) is None, "Incorrect flow"